|
Key
This line was removed.
This word was removed. This word was added.
This line was added.
|
Changes (2)
View page history| || || Pros || Cons || | [NMock|http://www.nmock.org/] | | | |
| | [TypeMock|http://www.typemock.com/] | * Mocks sealed objects and internal constructors - required to access various SharePoint Objects | * Requires the use of the Recording manager which can be a less than desirable method to develop unit tests. | |
| | [TypeMock|http://www.typemock.com/] | * Mocks sealed objects, static methods and internal constructors - required to access various SharePoint Objects * Easy to learn, author and maintain API. Intuitive AAA (Arrange-Act-Assert) API. * Professional customer support | * The price | |
| | [Microsoft Moles|http://research.microsoft.com/moles] | * Mocks sealed objects and internal constructors - required to access various SharePoint Objects - Intuitive authoring with Behaved Types - Available freely on Visual Studio Gallery | * Moles is still in a very early stage (MS Research) so still low staffed and no guarantee of support | | [Moq|http://code.google.com/p/moq/] | | | |
... |
