• Browse
  • Pages
  • Blog
  • Labels
  • Attachments
  • Bookmarks
  • Mail
  • Advanced

  • People Directory
• Log In
• Sign Up

1. Dashboard
2. SharePoint Implementation Play book
3. …
4. Home
5. SharePoint Development with Unit Testing
6. Required software to run unit tests within an environment
7. Comparisons of Mocking Frameworks for SharePoint Development

• Log In
• Sign Up

Comparisons of Mocking Frameworks for SharePoint Development

• Page restrictions apply
• Added by Jeremy Thake, last edited by yair on Jun 17, 2010  (view change)

Comment:

	Pros	Cons
NMock
TypeMock	Mocks sealed objects, static methods and internal constructors - required to access various SharePoint Objects Easy to learn, author and maintain  API. Intuitive AAA (Arrange-Act-Assert) API. Professional customer support	The price
Microsoft Moles	Mocks sealed objects and internal constructors - required to access various SharePoint Objects - Intuitive authoring with Behaved Types - Available freely on Visual Studio Gallery	Moles is still in a very early stage (MS Research) so still low staffed and no guarantee of support
Moq
RhinoMock

External References

• Unit Testing SharePoint using Isolator
• Unit Testing SharePoint Foundation with Microsoft Pex and Moles
• Unit Testing SharePoint Foundation with Behaviors

Labels parameters

Labels

Enter labels to add to this page:

 

Looking for a label? Just start typing.

Comments (1)

 

• Hide Comments Show Comments
• Collapse All Collapsing… Expanding… Expand All

1. 

   Jun 20

   chittibabau.k says:

   Your explantions exlent.plz tel me i want Migration problems and solutions in 20...

   Your explantions exlent.plz tel me i want Migration problems and solutions in 2007 to 2010.

   • Permalink

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Hosted generously by CustomWare